This week, a Baltimore Town circuit courtroom pass judgement on vacated the conviction of Adnan Syed—the topic of the 2014 hit podcast Serial—who have been convicted within the 1999 homicide of his ex-girlfriend and highschool classmate Hae Min Lee, and has maintained his innocence ever since. After serving 23 years of a lifestyles sentence, Syed was once launched from Jessup’s Patuxent Establishment on Monday and positioned in house detention.
Serial, some of the first true-crime deep-dives in podcast shape, became Syed’s case from an area tale right into a in style, did-he-or-didn’t-he obsession. And it wouldn’t have came about if now not for Rabia Chaudry, a legal professional who works at DC’s US Institute of Peace. Chaudry—one in all Syed’s longtime pals—has advocated on his behalf for many years and primary introduced his tale to the eye of Serial host Sarah Koenig.
Chaudry has lengthy had problems with the best way Koenig’s podcast advised Syed’s tale. Now that Syed has been launched—Maryland prosecutors have 30 days to mention whether or not he’ll be re-tried or the case will likely be dropped—pastime within the saga has kicked again up. And so has the Chaudry vs. Serial war, particularly on Twitter.
Right here’s the backstory:
Chaudry first criticized Serial to Sarah Koenig herself.
Chaudry started documenting her reaction to the podcast on her weblog in 2014. When Chaudry introduced the case to Koenig, she’d was hoping the journalist would strongly recommend for Syed. Chaudry was once additional annoyed by way of her lack of ability to have a say in what went into the episodes. After Koenig didn’t definitively assert Syed’s innocence on the conclusion of Serial, she and Chaudry reportedly had a number of “heated exchanges.”
In 2015, Chaudry introduced her personal podcast—and her personal investigation.
The primary season of Chaudry’s Undisclosed podcast additional explores Syed’s case (the next seasons delve into different probably wrongful convictions). In 2016, Chaudry advised Washingtonian: “Serial was once an important factor that might ever have came about to this situation.” However she is going onto ask, “if it was once such a lot of a tale for the Serial workforce, then why have they now not sought after to stay following the case afterwards?”
In Chaudry’s podcast, she and two different lawyers name consideration to the inconsistencies in key witness Jay Wild’s tale, in addition to different main points that had now not been integrated in Serial. Chaudry has used donations to the display to pay Syed’s felony charges.
In 2016, Chaudry launched Adnan’s Tale, a ebook concerning the case.
The entrance quilt reads “The seek for reality and justice after Serial.” Within the advent, Chaudry writes, “this ebook will inform the tales Serial didn’t and deal with problems with justice, bigotry, religion, devastation, therapeutic, and hope from the standpoint of Adnan and those that reinforce him.” She advised Washingtonian: “There have been little issues of frustration with Serial the place we felt it overlooked essential issues.”
In 2018, Chaudry tweeted a thread of pages from the ebook, together with Syed’s letters to Koenig and “the eccentricities that Serial by no means mentioned.”
Those come with flaws within the police’s dealing with of the case and her statement that Lee’s post-mortem conflicted with the state’s timeline, amongst different inconsistencies.
Chaudry served as manufacturer at the 2019 HBO documentary sequence The Case In opposition to Adnan Syed.
The documentary sequence aspects with Syed, by contrast to Serial‘s impartial way. HBO Documentary Movies will liberate a follow-up episode detailing Adnan’s liberate in 2023.
On September 16, 2022, a couple of days earlier than Syed’s liberate, Chaudry slammed Serial once more.
Chaudry tweeted: “Serial set fireplace to Adnan’s tale, to a point intentionally, and hasn’t ever apologized or made amends. Will have to I be thankful? I to find it laborious to be. However I’m thankful to the hundreds that spoke back to the fireplace to lend a hand rebuild this area.”
The day after Syed’s liberate, Serial put out a brief follow-up episode. Spoiler alert: Chaudry wasn’t into it.
Koenig defined the updates to the case and mentioned, “Even on an afternoon when the federal government publicly acknowledges its personal errors, it’s laborious to really feel cheered a couple of triumph of equity as a result of we’ve constructed a gadget that takes greater than twenty years to self-correct, and that’s simply this one case.” Chaudry wasn’t having it. She tweeted in reaction, “Once more, a wishy-washy dismissal of the hundreds of hours of labor we installed to get the Juvenile Recovery Act handed in Maryland, reinvestigate the case and to find new proof, and combat for each and every file from the state.”
On September 21, Asia McClain Chapman, who served as an alibi witness for Syed and was once prominently featured in Serial, had extra complaint for the podcast.
McClain Chapman tweeted, “I’m simply gonna say it. I hate Serial and I believe find it irresistible lacked an actual authentic worry for the folk concerned. I believe Sarah don’t give a rattling about any people. Adnan integrated.”
Ira Glass, host of This American Existence, the display that advanced Serial, got here to Koenig’s protection:
He tweeted “Sarah’s protection continues to be higher than somebody else’s. New episode of @serial is right here.” Chaudry spoke back: “As an alternative of acknowledging errors and correcting them and reporting new tendencies with due credit score, you simply triple down into your inaccurate narrative and reporting.”